Thread: the big indicator lie

Originally Posted by ;

quote This is nonsense. Employing USD 1 lot = 100,000 face leverage leverage 1:500 = demand only 200 USD to hold the position. 20 pips = 200 USD... today if you only have 300 usd in your account figure what will happen (;

DEAR MINGARY

you're A TEACHER FOR ALL, therefore I RESPECT YOUR WAY OF ADDING THINGS UP

IT IS NOT AT ALL NONSENSE

BUT LET'S FACE THE TRUTH

ARE YOU GOOD IN MATH, I GUESS SO, SO IF YOU READ MY COMPLETE EXPLINATION HERE, YOU WILL FEEL SORRY THAT WE ARE SPEAKING THE exact same BUT YOU RUSHED IN YOUR JUDGEMENT:
this is martinage employed in rollet wheel-- gaming...

I chose black randomly 1 usd
win I return to 1 usd
if I lose I double my bet 2
if I win I return to zero but if I shed
I use 3 and so on


in forex this is meaning killing your account, do not forget the margin
okay

allow me to clarify more

presume that your margin is 2.5 usd to get 0.01 lot for 1 lot as you want to exchange afterward margin is 250 usd so each time you exchange in wrong direction you will be out of 250 for each 1 lot to the broker

that's meaning

trial 1 such as 1 lot goes wrong ohh your floating reduction is 100 stage x 1 lot = 100 us along with your margin is 250 then your balance will be by 350 usd,

second trial, you make another buy by let's say 1 lot ( you are still concerned from the leadership assuming this is true as we are human ) then another 250 margin will be eliminated and oh my listen that the leadership is still wrong down then you will loose the next 100 usd and another 100 for your first commerce
so

your total margin now is 500 usd along with your floating reduction is 300 total is 800 usd....

And so on

you say from the 7th trade for instance the price will undo... Wow

do you know how much your floating reduction and your margin will be

okay

easy math ( I did not include the spread within my calculations to make your life easier)

7x250 = 1750 margin eliminated by the broker form your account

floating reduction is equal to the sum of the followings supposing you retained 1 lot trade at which it's filled with rudeness:
7x100-100 = valid if you presume that the 7th trade will acquire 100 usd
6x100
5x100
4x100
3x100
2x100
1x100
0x100 = now trade ( at which it will provide you 100 ve profit )

total floating reduction is 600 600 500 400 300 200 100 = 2700 usd

total out of your equilibrium is 2700 1750 = 4450 usd ( I did not include the spread within my calculations to make your life easier)

therefore that your account must have at least 7500 usd to protect your trades if you utilize one pair

come on man try to comprehend that this

SO THIS IS MEANING WIN 100 AND RISKING 4450

RATIO IS 100: 4450

1:44

SO THIS WILL WIPE OUT YOUR ACCOUNT



LOOK TO THE LEFT SIDE ON YOUR SCREEN NOW

YOU WILL SEE 5 GRID THREADS DEAD

TAKE A SNAP FOTO TOO...

Attached Image



I watched in the you tube b4 few days back yet another trader is swearing by god that inside only 130 usd he can make millions if he is using the hedging hog with the martinage as you did...
But he began with 130 usd along with his first lot is 2.58.... I can not understand this, \\ it's useless to exchange to observe the wrong acts considered by good folks like you and me from such newbie


the way to invent the wheel while it was being devised by somebody else....


I shall stop here.

Originally Posted by ;

quote DEAR MINGARY YOU ARE A TEACHER FOR ALL, therefore I RESPECT YOUR WAY OF ADDING THINGS UP IT isn't AT ALL NONSENSE BUT LET'S FACE THE TRUTH ARE YOU GOOD IN MATH, I GUESS SO, SO IF YOU READ MY COMPLETE EXPLINATION HERE, YOU WILL FEEL SORRY THAT we're SPEAKING THE exact same BUT YOU RUSHED IN YOUR JUDGEMENT: this is martinage employed in rollet wheel-- gambling... I chose black randomly 1 usd win I go back to 1 usd if I lose I double my bet two if I win I return to zero but if I lose I use 3 and so on in forex this is meaning killing your account, do not forget...

I am not a teacher.
My apologies I didn't understand you're speaking to a martingale scheme.
You're absolutely correct.

Originally Posted by ;

quote I am not a teacher. My apologies referred to a martingale scheme. You are correct.

Some genuinely intelligent posts on this thread. Basically trading is easy assume that the direction the market is going will continue it will. All my indior does is assess what is the potential could maintain a reversal against the trend. Many men and women see a movement and sell or buy paying no respect or just how far the transfer is extended.

Just assessing a market properly will inform you the place to buy or sell. Then being able to await the trade. Indiors make you pull the deal regardless any advantage you had is eroded. Indiors utilized in the area will give wining trades. But when the transactions are right as no indior can do that you need to figure out.

Would like to add that my forward looking indior suggests that the SP500 is because of a 600 to 1000 point proceed to the disadvantage I would expect the down movement to happen by the 21/22nd of the month so 20-22nd June 2017.

Simply to add that if you use an indior here rather than blindly trading a sell you actually await the sign to happen knowing that the cycle I expected is actually occurring. This is precisely what I meant by utilizing an indior.

I would also love to see a large push to up the cycle and if I'm correct Both price levels I would expect that the turn are 2454.50 or 2465.25 money market o the SP500

Originally Posted by ;

quote Determined by the words the salesman employed. I nevertheless don't think indiors are a lie, while I do concur with reveals a part of my decision making and this you don't need indiors. Sure, if the description tells you that it is currently making decisions for you and you must follow exactly what it says it was a lie. But why is it an indior at all, that should raise the question, it ought to be an EA. IMHO indiors are used the Incorrect way by people who do not know what they do at the...

Learnt from the Ideal

Originally Posted by ;

quote If computers could beat humans....why individuals are hired for trading places....

100% agreed

Originally Posted by ;

quote If computers can defeat individuals....why individuals are employed for trading positions....

Computers have been invented by humans, the majority of people overlook this..so how can they expect them to be smarter than people?

Originally Posted by ;

food for thought... John has been sold a lie. It's a lie really easy to believe. Since it makes so much sense. Near impossible to challenge its logic. And, really it is not a lie. I mean, if you think in something so much, and then spread this belief into people, can it be a lie? Didn't matter. John believed the lie: - You put indior A on your chart. - you put indior B on your chart. - you put indior C you chart. - If A, B, C (and E, F, G.. .) Are ALL telling you that the price is begging na go up, then the odds...

I dont think!!

John has not discovered yet the best indior?!
Tell John to download covfefe and what will change.

Covefefe is all John needs.

Originally Posted by ;

quote I dont think!! John hasn't found out the best indior?! Tell John to download covfefe and everything will change. Covefefe is John needs.

IMHO I would not suggest Covefefe based systems since they're based on drawdown. Coverage based systems are generally favorable equity systems.

Additionally, Covefefe repaints.

Originally Posted by ;

quote IMHO I wouldn't recommend Covefefe based systems as they're based on drawdown. Coverage based systems are generally positive equity systems. Covefefe repaints.

Repaint Bigly.