the big indicator lie
Page 1 of 733 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 321

Thread: the big indicator lie

  1. #1
    Food for thought...

    John was sold a lie.

    It is a lie so easy to think about. Because it makes
    so much sense.

    Near impossible to challenge its own logic.

    And, actually it is not a lie, per se. I mean, should you
    believe in something so much, and then spread this
    opinion to other people, is it a lie?

    Did not matter anyhow.

    John thought the lie:

    - You place indior A on your chart.

    - You then place indior B on your chart.

    - You then place indior C you chart.

    - If A, B, C (and E, F, G.. .) Are ALL telling you that
    the price is gont move up, then the probability of price
    going up is increased, right?

    So when John got confirmation (the price is gonna rise)
    and his indiors have been in agreement, he entered a
    lengthy trade.

    Then the impossible happened.

    Price stinks.

    John was angry, confuse, and disheartened.

    Perhaps he did not add enough indiors.

    Perhaps if he also got confirmation by a couple more indiors,
    the price could really shoot up.

    (like market price rises or falls just since these
    magic indiors say so...)

    So, he added indior X, and Y, and Z.

    Then the exact same thing happened.

    WTF.

    A vicious circle.

    No wonder John is frued.

    No wonder John falls again and again for the
    trend of the day everybody's trying to sell him.

    --

    Matt was sold exactly the same lie.

    It made perfect sense.

    If one indior is appropriate 50% of the time, another is
    right 50% of the time, then once both of them difficulty the
    same signal, the chance of it being appropriate has to be higher
    compared to 50%.

    Right?

    Nicely...


    Why would you believe unsuccessful traders are obsessed with
    market analysis?

    They crave the SENSE of certainty that analysis appears
    to provide them.

    Though few would admit it, the reality is that the typical
    trader would like to be right on every single trade.

    He's desperately trying to make certainty where it
    just does not exist.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Trading is an art rather than a mechanical process....if so computers could beat people in trading
    My guess is computers are beating humans in gambling. Maybe some professional traders could let us know how it is chiefly performed from the non-retail area.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote My guess is how computers are beating humans in gambling. Maybe some professional traders could tell us how it is chiefly done in the non-retail area.
    If computers could beat humans....why humans are employed for trading rankings...

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote If computers can beat humans....why individuals are employed for trading places....
    Nothing is 100% something or another if it is robots making cars or it's individuals making clothes. There is always a mixture of both. If I were to take a guess, I'd say there are trades being implemented by robots compared to humans. My guess is their joint net gain is greater than that of humans. Just my opinions

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote Nothing is ever 100% one item or another whether it is robots making automobiles or it's individuals making clothes. There is a mix of both. If I were to have a guess, I'd say there are more transactions being executed by robots compared to humans. Furthermore, my guess is their combined net gain is higher than that of humans. Only my remarks
    http://news.efinancialcareers.com/us...tronic-trading

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...obot-dominance

  6. #6
    Thank You for the article. I am really trying not to disagree but this article is pointing out that the companies are just (spending) more on humans than robots.

    It's an ambiguous statement and doesn't necessarily indicate the amount of traders (or number of placed trades or volume of trades) is increasing more than that of robots.

    Anyhow, I believe retail forex traders can beat the pants from institutional traders any day of the week. We've got access to a much more liquid spot market and with all the leverage we have, together with all the competitive broker choices we have, we can do much better than the professionals in almost any finance company (in terms of percentages, etc..)

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote Thank You for the article. I am really trying to not disagree but this post is pointing out that the companies are just (spending) more about humans than robots. It is an ambiguous statement and does not necessarily indicate the amount of human traders (or number of placed trades or quantity of trades) is growing over that of robots. Anyway, I think retail Currency Market traders can beat the pants off of institutional traders any day of the week. We have access to a far more liquid spot market and with the leverage we have, with the aggressive broker choices...
    Yes Harpy....thanks for your opinion....2nd article revealed% of equity cube trades executed through humans

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    food for thought... John has been sold a lie. It simple to believe. Since it makes sense. Near impossible to challenge its own logic. And, actually it is not a lie, per se. I mean, if you believe in something and then spread this belief to people, can it be a lie? Didn't matter. John thought the lie: - indior a is put by you on your chart. - you then put indior b on your chart. - you then put indior c you chart. - in case a, b, c (and e, f, g.. .) Are telling you that the price is gont move up, then the likelihood...
    again and again and agin and one million times I will probably say it in full mouth.... Leverage is the solution for the john angry troubles. .

    Just how and

    ahhh my heart


    when the leverage is 1:500 then when john opens one particular trade by 1 lot
    price is moving up, then he makes 1 lot = so the real is 500 lots in the market. . Then There'll be force to the south equivalent or more than 10 times your 500 lots ( I anticipate 5000 to 50,000 ) lots to activate his stop reduction by the guru or his broker or the related banks who can see his trade
    wow

  9. #9
    I enjoyed this research. So correct.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote again and again and agin and one million times I will state it in complete mouth.... Leverage is the answer for the john mad issues. . Ahhh my heart when the leverage is 1:500 then when john opens one particular commerce by 1 lot price is moving up, he then makes 1 lot so the actual is 500 lots on the market. . Afterward there'll be force into the south equal or more than 10 times your 500 lots ( I anticipate 5000 to 50,000 ) lots to trigger his stop reduction by the ace or his broker or the related banks who will see his commerce wow
    That is crap.

    Using USD
    1 lot = 100,000 face value
    leverage 1:500 = need just 200 USD to hold the position.
    20 pips = 200 USD
    ... now if you only have 300 usd on your account guess what will occur (;

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.