This is going to be a private space for me to practice the forbidden, bending the rules and breaking the conventional wisdom.
This is going to be a private space for me to practice the forbidden, bending the rules and breaking the conventional wisdom.
Basically it'll be a scanner based system, similar to the fracture of an adr high and low. So inside the range we doing reversals upon affirmation and moving with the tendency on the break.
Or is a lot more than that, my thoughts...
Taking the above mentioned data for instance, and link it with the Win in Trend and Grow in Range of carddard, an individual may test trading reversals as long as price is nearer than 51 pips into EMA10, and continuations when price exceeds 51 pips into EMA10.
When price exceeds a specific distance from a reference point (MA, Bands (MA STDDEV), Pivot... etc), doesn't necessarily mean it overshoot and will undo, on the opposite it might signify that it's enough energy to last.Originally Posted by ;
Entertaining stuff.Originally Posted by ;
I did previously coded an EA for backtesting purpose that was trading when price was in a specific distance from xxxEMA however, the problem was in my case the aggressive money management involved.
I believe you are going someplace with this believing and BTW I read your answer on the other thread and cough you were meaning something with the phrase in brackets.
Subscribed.
Regards
I did a little analysis on E/U H1 information for the last 4000 hours as a sample.
Below are a few findings:
The maximum distance btw EMA10 and High/Low (based on trend) has been 121 pips.
The average distance btw EMA10 and High/Low (based on trend) has been 17 pips, and stddev of 12 pips.
There are 1549 readings exceed the average of 17 pips to EMA10.
When we take just the readings over the typical (count 1549), and typical them, the typical becomes 40 pips, and stddev of 11 pips.
There are 197 readings exceed the new average of 40 pips to EMA10.
Adding the stddev of 11 pips to the average of 40 pips, gives us 51 pips away from EMA10.
Out of the 4000 readings there are 73 readings which exceeded 51 pips to EMA10.
The 4000 hours represent 33 trading months, and so that can give us an average of 2 to 3 trades each week.
I submitted this chart today on another thread answering a query, but deleted later after the question obtained deleted .
Let me post it here for additional study.
My comment on the chart was that E/U will most probably range for some time before continuing the emerging down tendency.
Thanks for everyone asked about my wellbeing.
I'm on pain relievers since over a month today.
It feels like it is going to require more time than I initially thought.
In this time I went through a thought process like I could not do much coding.
I will place the good models in practice and also discuss in accompanying threads.