The Independent Assessor again:
I contacted her office when I realized that the ombudsman's decision dated 2 days before my deadline to publish my opinion for the ombudsman's review died. She stated the date is wrong. She also said:
â€I will see that the Ombudsman saidâ€I have considered all the available evidence and arguments to decide what's fair and reasonable in the circumstances of this complaintâ€. For that reason, it seems that regardless of when the Ombudsman composed his conclusion, he took all of the evidence you filed into account.â€
Oh no! Perhaps not the magic sentence again! It convinced that the senior director and it had been sufficient to convince the individual assessor as well. The ombudsman made a fair and reasonable choice, since he said so. He believed all the available evidences, since he explained. Hilarious. Is it? How can somebody, claimed to be independent, alluding to the unfounded statement of a single side (the ombudsman) to disregard the evidences of the other hand (me)? I say an'independent' someone. Have I said yet that she's'independent'? It is not important what date you have on an official document. It is irrelevant if they're the sole breaching the deadline. The date on the legal document refers to when the document becomes official. The ombudsman's choice had become official two days before my deadline died.
On the other hand, do you recognize that she commented on the case?
â€Regardless of when the Ombudsman composed his conclusion, he took all of the evidence you filed into account,†she said. Before, when I complained about their bias citing unaddressed evidences and fundamentally wrong decisions, she vehemently refused to take care of my complaint, saying that she cannot comment on the case. Oh, wait. Now she defended the ombudsman, therefore she could comment on the case. Using the ombudsman's own stock phrases to defend the ombudsman clearly describes the integrity and the independence of the individual assessor.