The spikes were not there to assist anyoneOriginally Posted by ;
So far as I can see they have not provided a response, reasonable or otherwise, all they have said is they're investigating the issue which sounds sensible enough to me. Perhaps once it has been investigated, and resolved, they'll describe more about the situation which surrounded it is occurrence.Originally Posted by ;
I am guessing they have different servers and various liquidity providers, which might explain the discrepancy. In the end of the day it is just an erroneous spike and they seem willing to assist. What more could you like them to do?
I've got more than one account with Alpari as well as with different brokers. And the spikes do not appear on the other charts . You will find several on that one Alpari pro chart that does not appear on any chart with all the other brokers. I was not looking fro Alpari uk,Us or any other branch of Alpari to perform anything. All I needed to understand was has any one else about these forums found anything like this.Originally Posted by ;
I've been discovering a lot of spikes around this time daily on IBFX live also.
There was a system spike originating at Reuters so anybody who takes a direct feed Piggy Backs pricing from a Bank using Reuters as a source would have been changed. Also at the time of day most if not all Repair connections( Bank to Broker API) return for temporary maintenance at the date change. With few banks round, brokers are relying on 1 possibly 2 feed at that time Generally pricing algos would filter out invalid moves but from what I know from the point source, the transfer occurred in a collection of ticks lower ( midpoints) and then back up again creating the price difficult to filter.
All I am saying is why on just the pro account? Not the routine rather than on some of the other accounts?Originally Posted by ;
Think your million pound question might have already been replied old bean. .Originally Posted by ;
Originally Posted by ;
Brokers who invest over $20 million to make sure that they maintain regulations when the US market is declining in number of traders wont deliberately make matters that put them on the radar.
Take a closer look for example 1 minute time frame. Can it be just 1 minute bar which makes the peak or several? Can you look it more closer 10 minutes maybe?
If short peaks in query these sort of peaks serves well for a trailing stop searching. Simple money for those who are doing this.
If someone stopped a winning place for these peaks it is apparent that someone is making money out of these.
Brokers/developers spending millions for its backend systems and such an effortless filter function cannot be made... absurd... or perhaps it is in purpose?
I am positively surprised if we'll get any understandable response from the Broker (in this thread)...