ATC Brokers - Page 2
Page 2 of 7316 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 3158

Thread: ATC Brokers

  1. #11

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Hey, it took me 10 minutes to discuss this very long announcement...
    I really don't know. . .all this words just to say customers are introduced by them to FXCM and that their MT4 has FXCM pricing?

    As far as I understand FXCM is up an running with MT4 from ages, here it looks like these guys are running cape canaveral space control...

  3. #13
    Http://www.atcbrokers.com/forums/vie...4start=10#p296

    http://www.atcbrokers.com/forums/vie...php?p=296#p296by http://www.atcbrokers.com/forums/mem...iewprofileu=53 on Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:57 pm
    At the time of this writing, traders have been awaiting a remedy to late fills and slippage, because of release this afternoon, which at this period FXCM has been unable to respond with a finished alternative, with no next confirmation from FXCM on their current disposition, despite numerous requests from ATC.

    Live traders have experienced widening spreads and late fills, occurring on the FXCM afternoon or Asian sessions on mostly Euro based symbols. ATC has finished our code side of executing the FXCM Range/IOC order handling system to address this concern. FXCM has shown since testing started Monday, to not be capable on their aspect of assuring their order processing method and slippage outside target has been demoned to continue in testing.

    This effect is resulting in ...

    A) as much as 2 percent of trades filling outside a 30 second window of period
    and
    B) slippage on the FXCM network where FXCM remains allowing slippage past the level filed to permit.

    The end result of a fill beyond 30 minutes becomes a danger of slippages or becomes a Dis-integrated order from the MT system and stays on the FXCM network within an unaccountable fill, in the client's account, setting off alarms in the ATC backoffice to permit for manual intervention of this order. Not a perfect solution but believes there should not be a brokerage option to suspend an order fill.

    The problem in obtaining this order procedure finished with FXCM has been a troublesome problem for ATC and our traders, to the degree we are beginning to consider arbitrary cancels of delayed orders or automation to process invoicing of late fill losses ahead for refunds.

    We are more than understanding of technical problems as any programmer, however the time and effort lost, absence of response, follow-through and otherwise insufficient SOME step of progress, constantly starts to tell a story bigger than just the inherent problem, despite many good things FXCM has performed with ATC thus far.

    We are forced at this point to simply assume FXCM is wagering to fix their issues over the upcoming weekend and at this point we apologize we are unable to offer any additional information to traders, until we post here farther.

    More will follow as we're able. Traders must subscribe to this thread to be informed by email.

    Thank you

    ATC Brokers - Support

  4. #14
    I really enjoy the people at ATC but never trusted the FXCM facet of the equation. Now I am sure my instincts were spot-on. Sounds as though they are saying that they cant really make their order routing operate as advertised(in a orderly and timely fasion?) . Before they even start Hope that they function it out-hate to see people get burnt.

  5. #15
    If you're having problems with ATC broker fills, then why would not you move to FXCM? ATC brokers are a white label of FXCM and when you factor in the commissions they charge, you're in fact paying MORE at ATC than at FXCM directly (no commission).

    ATC is just like Fastbrokers they claim to offer this 'ECN, NDD, STP' model for 'enhanced execution' but in reality just white label some bucketshop FCM and throw the phrases 'technology, bridge, ECN' on there site. .

    Do not be fooled men -- If you don't need MT4 and also have $20k to play, use a respectable CNX broker.

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    ATC is like Fastbrokers because they claim to offer you this 'ECN, NDD, STP' model for 'enhanced execution' but actually just white label a few bucketshop FCM and throw the words 'technologies, bridge, ECN' on that site. .

    Don't be fooled guys -- If you don't need MT4 and also have $20k to perform with, use a reputable CNX broker.
    First of all, I really don't believe ATC is just another bucketshop. I think they're trying to turn into a secure and reputable broker. I think they're currently making a mistake relying upon the hardware and appliions feeds of FXCM.

    Those of us who don't have $20,000 to perform need a trusted choice, therefore, BostonForex, who do YOU urge???

    Thanks.

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    First of all, I don't believe ATC is just another bucketshop. I think they are striving to become a safe and respectable broker. But, I think they are making a mistake relying upon the hardware and software feeds of FXCM.

    Those people who don't have $20,000 to perform need a trusted choice, so, BostonForex, who do YOU urge???

    Thanks.
    These are my feelings exactly. In repairing their feed issues Hope they succeed.

  8. #18
    1
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    If you are experiencing issues with ATC broker fills, then why wouldn't you move right to FXCM? ...
    words of a clueless guy right there....

    If u had the demo you'd understand what the fuss is about... off go to FXCM and love the matches I'm happy to wait on an excellent ECN broker to be ready for my account.

    shsssssss...

  9. #19
    Could somebody please explain for me. . .if ATC is utilizing FXCM data, does that mean FXCM and ATC charts are indistinguishable? I have been charting with ATC for awhile and I am noticing some strange things on 1 min charts. . .like a whole bunch of bull candles in a row without a single bear candle, with openings that are jagged all over the place. I am confused about how a bucketshop's data could be used by an ECN and still be an ECN. Any input would be appreciated.

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    I am confused as to how an ECN could use a bucketshop's data and be an ECN.
    ATC was supplying an MT4 bridge to Hotspot FXr. Hotspot FXr was bought by FXCM and their clients were merged onto FXCM's Active Trader ECN platform (different platform in the vanilla FXCM bucketshop feed). ATC is supplying an bridge to FXCM Active Trader.

    ATC is just an introducing broker, a few guys running a whitelabel shop. Their FX Institutional has been coming for 2 years. .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.