ATC Brokers - Page 3
Page 3 of 7316 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 3158

Thread: ATC Brokers

  1. #21
    Gotcha. I had been unaware that FXCM had an ECN setup.

  2. #22
    Http://www.atcbrokers.com/forums/vie...astart=10#p302

    http://www.atcbrokers.com/forums/vie...php?p=302#p302by http://www.atcbrokers.com/forums/mem...iewprofileu=53 on Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:41 am
    This communiion reviews process regarding Market Range order form which was to go online this week, to encourage slippage control and decrease delayed fills. After testing with FXCM on keeping market range a week, (tested in a demonion setting), FXCM reported updated the process to the live environment over the weekend.

    Monday morning, April 27, ATC confirmed with FXCM, the update had been put in place on the FX reside environment. Upon our subsequent in kind at 17:00, its fitting update which grossly failed to process in live and was reverted immediately was set up by ATC.

    Upon contact to FXCM to determine the cause of errors encountered, ATC was informed by FXCM direction that FXCM had in fact not updated their live environment, as a consequence of compliions that their demo testing was having with other parties linking to them.

    At this time, ATC is left to assume that next Monday, FXCM will attempt again to resolve this issue. However, without the willingness of FXCM ownership to come forward and commit to a more comprehensive solution, ATC remains concerned that even among the limited advantages of Range IOC slippage management, lack of true Depth of market fills will find traders with numerous tight suits or order rejections. Range IOC is at best, a restricted approach to the issue of design of true ECN behavior or handling liquidity.

    It is regrettable we know of these limitations well after accepting FXCM's commnt to offer dependable quality of fill capacity. It appears that FXCM is caught in a technology vacuum it is management or ownership isn't able to find lasting solutions for, short of creating a new ECN they may aspire to control more faithfully. In short, FXCM appears to be trying, but continued to run into a barrier of technologies so many companies have in acquired or custom solutions.

    ATC will update here farther, of any information we might learn about this from FXCM.

    If there's something positive to discuss, spreads have improved the majority of the desired goal symbols, sustaining so much even on the day EST sessions.

  3. #23
    Month they will begin of becoming separate from fxcm, I was advised. With lesser commissions and more lp's, lower spreads etc.. Eurusd is supposed to be .2/.3 pip, commission $30 per million.

  4. #24
    Stil a third more costly than IB. Whats the point. .

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    They will start of being separate from fxcm next month, I was advised. With lower commissions and more lp's, lower spreads etc.,. Eurusd is assumed to be .2/.3 pip, commission $30 per million.
    Dont believe they have the money to become a full fledge broker, mabe they hooking up with another broker as IB profit

  6. #26
    Nevertheless will be my favorite brokerage, but it Will Seem like they're setting up for a full fledged brokerage outside the US:

    https://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firm...0__?sid=309581

    Looks like they're teaming up with a Mr Ruscak Vladimir, same Man behind FX Hill

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Stil a third more costly than IB. Whats the purpose. .
    I am with IB, but I believe atc is decent too and may be a good choice or broker to the side. Do not know about fx hill.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Nevertheless will never be my favorite brokerage, but it does Seem like they're setting up for a full fledged brokerage outside the US: https://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firm...0__?sid=309581 Looks like they're teaming up with a Mr Ruscak VladimirExactly the same Man behind FX Hill
    so they will probly still use fxcm for u.s. clients

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote so they will probly still use fxcm for u.s. clients
    I would concur. Can't view ATC wanting to install the $20m in internet capital they'd want to to get setup. And of course, since they've fine and that BCC in the NFA for taking the side of their clients' trades I can't see the NFA making it easier for them to get started.

  10. #30
    Http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firmP....do?sid=309581 Dealing in investments as agent but do not have Dealing in investments as principal as with other broker. What exactly does this imply?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.