Ok, I know you and really well know what you significance. I meeting too some bad (occasionally so unnecessary) mistakes in the codes, such as our loved (or hated) TrendMagic, which if the CCI is oscilating about 0 (when pub is progress) fill either of buffers, it does not know exactly how color may has and on next pub voluntarily repaints. If I had a code, a tiny change could be made (when pub closes, read the value of CCI and reverse buffer let us get emptiness ). The new ver of TM I cannot code, I dont even know how functions levelling, I know that it is some kind of ATR, but exactly I dont know. This is one example poor coded indi. But, in another hand the identical thing, coder, who did it, left it some hours of his/her work, and understand that it is her house, his own concept, his programming style....Unfortunately, here (I dont mean HERE, in thread, but on the internet generally) is considerably men what a) copy/plagiate operate by somebody else, which difficulty as their own, and at times, what is much more more worst, b) attempt sell it by somebody other, who unsuspect something bad. 1 story, my expertise. I had a friend, together with him I developed a system (btw predied on CCI(50), I mean that it is one of few indis that's good on the forex), which we ran on actual. I gave him for free a copy of EA, which I typed, together with source code, where been written some copyrights, etc.... About six, seven month later, another friend emailed me, where told me when I have a curiosity to buy some CCI-based system, which he bought, obtained a back-and-forward test and seems very very good. I responded him maybe, let ship me a part of the code where is entering illness. Ok, part I obtained, and on the very first look was apparent, that is my job. So wrote friend back, that I have a feeling, the code that which he bought wasn't a seller, and delivered him my backup, to compare. Match, word-by-word, line-by-line, different in only one thing: At beginning of code, you have a comment, and property directives, resembles:Quote:
Originally Posted by ;
/ ------------------------------------------------------------------
//| _v3,0. Mq4 |
//| Frank_ |
//| http://www.metaquotes.net |
// ------------------------------------------------------------------
#property copyright Frank_
#property link http://www.metaquotes.net
//-- enter parameters.
Only this has been re-wrote from the othes. Out of curiosity, he (buddy ) bought plagiated work for 200 euros. Outrageous.
Since this, I will never public my codes, together with exceptions as extremely important cases. The EA, exactly what I now testing ( is went-away for this particular week, so need testing just myself), also when allows (the machine is his property, the code mine), I will public when it be achieved, but just as published .ex4, replie of code get just, as author the soul of this machine.
Now you're know why some authors isn't pleased to public theirs code?
EDIT: should you wanna (anybody ) to change some factors in my job or edit function of other people (as e.g. adding the alarms ), simply let me, I will do its changes, or create an extern, to-set factor, with it you can change e.g. a color, widht, or form...