Divergence and hidden Divergence - Page 2
Page 2 of 732 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 317

Thread: Divergence and hidden Divergence

  1. #11

  2. #12

  3. #13

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    I am really backtesting on divergence as of now... here's my cheat sheet version: 1 ). If u see an uptrend on the chart and there is a divergence about the tops- it's a reversal 2. If un an uptrend and divergence on the 2 points that are bottom - it's a continuation . Downtrend on chart with divergence on points - reversal 4. Downtrend on chart with divergence on top points - continuation I utilize stochastic on 4H TF - so far has gone 130 trades with decent result, however, averaging on 5-8 setups/month we will see how I go then... good luck there! ...
    Described so beautifully!

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    I personally have found that the Stochastics set at 8,3,3, to show divergences far better than MACD or RSI, Look in the attached chart stochastics is showing equally normal divergence and Hidden Divergence, where as MACD hasn't shown either. The choice of what you use is an issue of personal taste. But place both on a chart in your favorite time period and see which you prefer. The attached PDF will provide you a simple explanation of Divergence with clear chart examples. picture picture
    --
    Hi Dee50,
    Nice to know you! Thanks for the Bdf
    Could you share me the Sotochastic Divergence Indior?
    Thanks! happy trading

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote -- Hi Dee50, Nice to know you! Thanks for the Bdf Can you talk about me the Sotochastic Divergence Indior? Thanks! Joyful trading
    The Stochastics indior is MT4 standard, the divergences are hand drawn, you will find indiors here onforexsoutheast.asiathat can draw the Divergences for you personally but I have never bothered with them therefore I can not guide you to a trusted one, if such a thing exists.

  7. #17
    Isn't divergence crap the most deceiving useless crap in the analysis?

    Am stupid or wrong:

    that a MACD is a difference of two MAs

    use typical 12 26 9 like

    some mad ppl points a daily chart, shouting, see, divergence evolved more than 3 weeks, golden opportunity to short!

    Feck me, man, that current MACD worth is difference of current 12 and 26 MAs. And you compare this to 3 weeks ago's 12 and 26 days prior MA worth, and also you said comparing these two values give you an edge??? Heck, I don't need a backtest to convince me it is crap.

    Ok, I admit that I have seen some profitable traders using divergence. That helps my confidence really -- stupid ppl believing wrong concepts can be profitable too (by doing major things right), so I can either.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.