For EA Addicts Only: Show Us Your Best EA Results - Page 2
Page 2 of 732 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 318

Thread: For EA Addicts Only: Show Us Your Best EA Results

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Incidently... for anyone wanting to save money to open a live account, if you're a drinker, learn to make your own booze and bank the money you save. By making my poison I save about $50 per week.
    Sounds interesting that will be another thread or a private discussion on the sorts of elixirs and how you create them.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote 2000:1 reeks of scam broker. But even if they were legit, it is not sustainable, what happens if your account gets to $5000 or $50,000.
    The broker is Exness, Russian possessed I believe. I believe once a account reaches $500 the leverage reduces to 1000:1 then as it becomes greater the leverage reduces further. Is that the ability to begin trading with 1 cent micro trades instead of 10 cent miniature trades. It would give a trader the ability to trade an account as little as say $50.
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    . This thread is beginning to become a Money Management thread, and I'd like to keep it a Super Profitable EA thread rather
    In my view MM is the thing that makes a method, EA or otherwise, super profitable.

    As for making booze, search Google for house distiller

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote The broker is Exness, Russian owned I believe. I believe once an account reaches $500 the leverage reduces then because it gets higher the leverage reduces farther. The only advantage I see is that the ability to begin trading with 1 cent micro trades as opposed to 10 cent mini trades. It might give a trader the ability to trade an account as small as state $50. quote In my opinion MM is the thing that makes a method, EA or otherwise, super profitable. As for creating booze, search Google for home distiller
    Even if your EA could effective trade profitably with super high leverage state 500 or even 1000:1.... Even if you are ready to protect against enormous leveraged losses, then you would still have to manually adjust or program that an algorithm to correct the leverage per trade according. The possible problem happens at the crossover points, seeing as you are trading a number of places at one time, you'd have some trades trading at two or three times greater leverage than other people at around precisely the same time interval which would create massive equity curve volatility greater than what would be anticipated than with predetermined leverage. There are people doing it, but I prefer a constant as equity curve, which can be difficult to maintain without having max leverage change.

  4. #14
    I'm with you there... I'll do it using a sub account at Axi I think.

  5. #15
    Alright. Sunday night. Back to work. Get ready for a fascinating week. Back next week when I can.

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    And to start off this... My most recent EA: Outcomes from 05/16/2013 to 7/18/2013 (2 months) $100 - $573,000 Open Prices modeling was used because my EA specifically transactions on pub opening. The outcomes are 99.9% similar for control factors used and for each tick procedure used. image
    question is can that be done ?

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote Problem with a $100 beginning is that you need to possess high leverage, which excludes your own American readers that have a 50:1 ball n chain. I am not a risk taker nowadays, therefore the minimum account size I would begin with is $1,000 and risk just .01 lot per commerce.
    50:1 to a isn't actually a problem. It is definitely not likely function When an EA can not display potential. Additionally, there are several U.K. arms of U.S. brokers who will take American clients and allow them to trade at 100:1.

    In case, 50:1 would still still suit you good at 0.01 per $1000.

  8. #18
    Thought I would wake this thread up again.

    Just finished working on a new concept. Even though the results are based on 500:1 and broker cease out of 20%, I thought I would set it up here.

    Please no PMs asking me from strangers. Not available and not available for testing.

    Latest iteration:
    *no martingale, utilizes equity established position sizing
    *no indies on primary entry
    *1 shared indi for secondary entrance filter
    *really aggressive MM which can be modified for reduced risk appetite, but back test submitted is at near max risk profile
    *no weekend holds, unless I screw up on vaions
    *no instantly holds unless swap is optimistic
    *entrance algo is proprietary
    *currently set at a max of seven trades in either direction (max 14 open positions)
    *utilizes hard tp and sl, but exit algos will usually exit before either is hit.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.