Greenspan and Currencies - Delusional? - Page 11
Page 11 of 7311 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 104 of 3104

Thread: Greenspan and Currencies - Delusional?

  1. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    SorryI should be clear that I'm not searching for a response for me the question's already been answered a long time ago. And maths is the wrong tool for this as well, since there's an assumption that non-random = profitable. But sticking with maths for a moment...

    Do you consider then, by way of example, the hourly distribution of range highs/lows plotted by hour for the previous 1/2/5/10 years to become nothing but a freak occurrence?
    Trihop, Thank you for your ideas. I am not likely to engage at this moment. If you think that forex cannot be explained in mathematical terms, then I am afraid that I can't say or introduce anything of value to you. My points are fairly nicely laid out in the long-term Profits with Negative Expectancy thread. I wish you well.

    Regards

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    SorryI must be clear that I am not searching for a response because for me the question's already been answered a long time ago. And maths is the wrong tool for this too, since there's an assumption that non-random = profitable. But sticking with maths for a minute...

    Do you consider then, by way of instance, the hourly distribution of range highs/lows plotted by hour for the previous 1/2/5/10 years to be nothing but a freak occurrence?
    Couldn't agree more.
    Maths is your way for high-freq trading that, to operate correctly, demands access to an extensive amount of funds. Nevertheless sets the transactions based on monitoring the orderflow.

    Everything comes back to accumulation distribution.
    (attempting ) to monitor the orderflow and studying demand/ supply situations in the market is that the way to go. Combine that with yourself as the holy grail and you have the system you are searching.

  3. #103
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    couldn't agree more.
    Maths is your way for high-freq trading which, to work correctly, needs access to a broad amount of funds. Nevertheless, even this occurence that's based on maths places the trades based on tracking the orderflow.

    It all comes back to buildup distribution.
    (trying) to track the orderflow and studying demand/ supply situations in the market is the thing to do. Combine that with yourself as the holy grail and you've got the system you're searching.
    Position on Dr G. Maths is nice to implement trading strategies - simple volatility breakout ones are only dumb equations and HFT techniques appear to be determined by Brownian movement algorithms (at least what their job ads say they are searching for). It's just not adept at proving demand/supply exists. But since demand/supply is your market, the question wasn't is it random, but are there gamers large enough to move the market (yes), therefore can it be possible to deduce what those players are going to do (yes).
    Will they alter their methods over time? Doubtlessly yes.

    That's why I find the Entire randomness question so maddening, but take your stage Petra, we've been down this road so all of the best

  4. #104
    HELLO? Hahah ahh how I needed that. Thank you bro.

    I am not feeling that well at this time.

    Let's just shut down the Currency Marketz.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.