95012I do not want to be right or wrong on this so there's nothing to repay.Originally Posted by ;
I merely meant to say it's not something I view as positive over what we're all here to do - trade actively. If it had been I'd have just bought a lot of ETFs (exchange traded funds - index trackers) or a similiar thing with a little or no lever and placed all of my funds in that, sat back and prayed - and then spent all the 2-4 months of this mini-crash biting my nails and then cheering on the way upward, like every know-the-markets-only-from-newspaper-reading-John-Doe fella on the market.
As it is I rather actively traded throughout the meltdown and then on the way back up.
I am only saying it's not my investment or risk profile. . .and therefore doesn't suit prognosis or my beliefs / time horizon / whatever you would like to call it.
My counter-points remain valid regardless of that the phrasing for me(contingency / causality / profile).Originally Posted by ;
So why not buy shares, inventory based funds, index trackers..dividends will pay the equivalent to interest e.g.Originally Posted by ;
Where is that anything new when compared with this guy that said buy shares,money in 80 years later? Can't recall who it was, one of the names anyhow.
Well either that, but that is because of its stock markets actually, or that there won't be a decorrelation, a running off in the Yuan and JPY therefore subsequently and the yield curve remains intact, etc, and so on.Originally Posted by ;
Not my thing.