Recommended quotno last lookquot, fast execution, reliable brokers
Page 1 of 732 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 311

Thread: Recommended quotno last lookquot, fast execution, reliable brokers

  1. #1
    Please recommend no previous look implementation brokers. (Brokers must meet all 3 standards) If you disagree with someone's recommendation then explain why.

  2. #2
    You need to understand what look is. The LP has the capability to recheck within 0-50ms or when they receive a request to reject your order. This protects an LP linked to a ECN from a quote that might have become stale. This occurs quite frequently, but you wont notice it.

    A decent broker keeps track of LP implementation times on a normal basis and then switches LPs off that are under-performing or promotes those that are executing well. They can also personalize feeds for clients, but that's in extraordinary cases where you're doing lots of quantity (gt;100 lots/mo....really more like gt;500 lots/mo) Unfortunately, most of the retail brokers don't have a prime broker relationship (which is harder to get nowadays).

    With that said, Global Prime Au, IC Markets, FxOpen Au or UK ECN accts, RubixFx are great for retail trading. Interactive Brokers if you do not need mt4.

  3. #3
    I think fxpro is fast . I use also roboforex they are reasonable but fxpro is so speedy c trader
    all have a wonderful day

  4. #4
    How wide-spread is features? Does institutional platforms have this? Any rough ideas on large this can be?

    Thanks Beforehand,
    Dagfinn Rime
    home.bi.no/dagfinn.rime
    (Finance Professor with curiosity in FX trading. Writer of the Most Recent BIS FX volume-reports)

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    I think fxpro is fast . I use also roboforex they are fair but fxpro is so speedy c trader have a wonderful day
    I need additional confirmation since they chaged there support way .

  6. #6
    Trusted broker accept person,
    lmax.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    How wide-spread is last-look features? Does institutional platforms have this? Any ideas on large this is? Thank you in advance, Dagfinn Rime home.bi.no/dagfinn.rime (Finance Professor with interest in FX trading. Author of the Most Recent BIS FX volume-reports)
    Rides upon the platform, but most do. The two biggest interdealer platforms don't have this (Icap EBS Markets and Reuters Dealing). However, these two companies also operate a bilateral platforms (EBS Immediate and also FXAll, gaining marketshare with these) who do possess it. Other ECNs and aggregation service providers (Currenex, Hotspot, Integral) do possess it too, and single dealer bank platforms obviously too.

    Among the issues is that there's not much disclosure about the extent of last look privileges - how long can a price-maker sit on an order before either rejecting or filling it. Apparently typical is 300 or 200 milliseconds. Its basically a license to print money if not policed by the platform operator (marketmakers with overly high rejection rates could be disabled on a client-by-client basis).

    How large is that? Basically all digital flow except EBS and Reuters Dealing (these two combined have roughly $200 to $300bn ADV) and CME stocks(last I checked about 100bn ADV). Having a couple more exceptions for example lmax who are tiny in comparison (like 10bn ADV).

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Please urge no previous look, fast implementation, reputable brokers. (Brokers must meet all three criteria) If you disagree with someone's recommendation then explain the reason why.
    Hi Spox,

    well perhaps it's possible to say where are you coming from since it's an integral factor. There are a number of different issues to consider when you open an account. What's essential for you?

  9. #9
    Underneath your standards fits any STP/ECN broker with rather a experience on the market. If you want low spreads - may attempt FreshForex ECN account with zero spraed on EURUSD. What trading condition are important for youpersonally?

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Please urge no previous appearance, quick implementation, reputable brokers. (Brokers must satisfy all 3 criteria) If you disagree with a person's recommendation then explain the reason why.
    NLL and Fast implementation must come hand in hand together. Broker offering NLL but implementation is over 7ms (excluding your distance latency), is definitely not a NLL.

    A true NLL ought to be sub ms. But depends on their order fitting and Pre-risk test technology that could increase the implementation latency. But all should be on average around 5ms.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.